Grad Slam presentations will be judged in the 11 categories below and awarded scores from 1-5 (5=best) for a maximum score of 55.
COMPREHENSION AND CONTENT
Score 1-5 in the five categories below
1. Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background and significance of the research question being addressed, while explaining terminology and avoiding jargon?
2. Did the presentation clearly describe the impact and/or results of the research, including conclusions and outcomes?
3. Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
4. Was the thesis topic, research significance, results/impact and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
5. Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed?
ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION
Score 1-5 in the six categories below
1. Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
2. Was the presenter careful not to trivialize or generalize the research?
3. Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for the research?
4. Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention?
5. Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range, maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
6. Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was the image clear, properly sized and concise?
The scoring and decision of the adjudicating panel are final and not debatable.
This rubric is based on the Western Association of Graduate School’s (WAGS) 3MT Competition.